Greetings everyone. I have just spent the last 5 hours removing, cleaning and replacing the stove pipes for the cook stove and the furnace. A filthy dirty job if there ever was one. I look like a chimney sweep which, in essence I am. The furnace pipes came down first, I then took them outside to clean. Since we are living as close to 1865 as possible, cleaning the pipes means NO CHEMICALS!!!! This meant I had to come up with a period method of cleaning. I built a small fire and set the pipes on it one at a time. The creosote built up inside the pipes gradually heated up and then (as I secretly hoped) burst into flame! This melted the creosote and burnt it off as well, leaving an easily removed ash.
Took about an hour to do this and the pipes are remarkably clean. So much so that I noticed one of the elbows will need replacing beause it is full of small holes. The furnace pipes have been re-assembled and the furnace lit and it is drawing quite nicely thank you.
I must also mention I cleaned a good deal of ash from the furnace fire box. We want to make soap early in 1866 (2012) so this ash will become lye water, one of the ingredients of soap the other being animal fat.
The cook stove also got a good cleaning, pipes and all. I took the top off the stove, remove the pipes for cleaning and set about removing creosote and accumulated ash. The pipes were not as caked up with creosote as the furnace pipes so I simply wacked them on the outside with a stick, shook out the loose creosote and soot and re-assembled them to the stove. Inside the stove there was quite an accumulation of ash and soot, all of which had to be removed mechanically with a brush and scrapper. That being done, the top of the stove was cleaned up and re-assembled. I have yet to build a fire in the stove but it should draw much better now.
Margaret has a book which contains excerpts and quotations from letters written durintg the Victorian Age in Upper Canada. There is mention of cleaning stove pipes which apparently was a job which made folks testy to say the least and was dirty to boot! It would seem that my foray into pipe cleaning was a simple little re-enactment of a dirty Victorian task in Upper Canada.
It may seem an obvious thing but good dry wood is a must if you want to keep the build up of creosote and soot to a minimum. I have been guilty of leaving our wood out and partially uncovered. In a normal winter this would not be such a problem. However, this year has proven to be a wet one to say the least and it has continued to be so right up to the present time. So bad me, we have some wet wood to deal with and I'll be cleaning pipes again in a month or so most likely. My penance I guess. (Insert dramatic sigh!) :-)
That's all for now, talk to you soon.
Ken
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I love the ambiance and heat delivered by a good old fashioned wood stove. The down side is definitely the added dust and necessary cleaning of the pipes. Hope all was well in your trip to Guelph. HAPPY HOLIDAYS.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. The warmth is wonderful. Yup there is tons of dust,a fine dust all over the house .So I seem to have to clean more. Our trip to Guelph was nice especially spending Christmas with the Grandchildren. We all got a cold though and everyone has been sick. I feel especially bad for our Aidan, he has spent the entire Christmas break sick,poor little guy. Very Happy Holidays to you and Thank you for your comments...
ReplyDeletegood dry wood is necessary otherwise it will not easy to clean your stove pipe.
ReplyDeleteHi chimney pipe, it is indeed necessary to have dry wood. I have learned to compensate somewhat for the wet wood. It is set up near the furnace (about five feet away) and does dry slowly. Usually this doesn't completely dry the wood out, but it does help. I've been keeping an eye on the stove pipes pretty closely and there is some creosote coating the pipes in a thin layer. It isn't building up very quickly so I hope to have only one more pipe cleaning session before spring. I'm planning on to start laying up wood for next year in order to reduce this problem to a minimum.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ken.